TEN x 100 SWIM TEST PROTOCOL
A simple and effective test for swimmers of all ages
By Wayne Goldsmith
Coaches and swimmers are always looking for ways to test and measure how they are going in training. Swim test sets are one method of analysing the progress of swimming training and to gather vital information to ensure your training program is helping you achieve your goals.
Why test?
Swimming successfully is a bit like taking a journey from one place to the other. First, you make sure you know exactly where you are. From knowing where you are starting, you can decide where to go next. Once you decide where to go, you plan a course of action how to get there. Every so often you stop and check the map to make sure you on the right track and have not got lost along the way.
Swimming test sets are a bit like those little “map checks”. Every so often in your training program it is important to stop and check your progress. Information gained by regular testing provides you with direction for your next step and future course of direction.
As with all tests there are ten fundamental steps in the process.
This is a simple but effective and useful swimming test set that coaches and competitive swimmers of all ages can use to measure where they are in their preparation. It is a MULTI DISCIPLINARY test protocol which means it looks at physiological areas as well as biomechanical and technical aspects of swimming performance.
Test overview:
3
x (3 x 100 metres) with a 200 metre swim down after each set of 3.
5 minutes rest then a single 100 metres maximum speed swim.
Cycle times:
Freestyle/Fly/Back : First 3 on 1:40, Next 3 on 1:50, Next 3 on 2:00
Breast : First 3 on 2:00, Next 3 on 2:10, Next 3 on 2:20
(i.e. the swimmer gets more rest as the speed increases).
Intensity levels:
1st set of 3 x 100 are at AEROBIC LEVEL (eg approx. 1500 plus pace)
2nd set of 3 x 100 are at THRESHOLD PACE (eg approx. 400 pace)
3rd set of 3 x 100 are at VO2 PACE (eg approx. 200 pace)
Final 100 is an all out, Maximum Speed effort.
All swims are push starts.
Test Example: FREESTYLE
Race Day Warm up (always a good idea to fine tune race day / competition warm up by using it to warm up for test sets)
Test Procedure:
3 x 100 Aerobic Pace on 1:40
200 Easy Swim
3 x 100 Threshold Pace on 1:50
200 Easy Swim
3 x 100 VO2 Speed on 2:00
200 Easy Swim
5 minutes rest
100 Maximum Speed all out effort
Race day swim down.
Test Logistics (what you will need):
Pace clock
Stop Watch
Recording sheets (see attached)
Pens / Clip boards
Long course / short course pool
Heart rate monitors if available
Lactate Testing equipment if available (including sharps and contaminated items disposal unit).
Data collectors: one per swimmer would be ideal – enlist parents, assistant coaches, resting swimmers, anyone who can write!!!!
Swimmer prerequisites:
This test can be used with age groupers as well as senior swimmers. However, it is imperative that any swimmer undergoing this test protocol has a well developed PACING ability. (Note: This applies for most swimming tests, e.g. 7 x 200 Step Test, 7 x 50 Stroke Efficiency Test where increasing speed is involved. It may be that younger age group swimmers or less experienced swimmers will need to spend several months learning accurate pacing skills before they are capable of completing this test effectively).
Variables to be measured:
Take Time, Heart Rate, Stroke Count and Stroke Rate for each 100m. Take lactate (if available) after each set of 3 x 100.
After
100 max speed swim, take Heart Rate, Lactate (if available) at 3-5 mins post
swim, and Heart Rate at 0 seconds (i.e. as soon as possible after the swimmer
touches the wall), 30 seconds post swim, 60 seconds post swim and 90 seconds
post swim to check swimmer’s recovery from the maximum speed swim.
Have the swimmer perform his/her usual swim down eg 600-800 metres, and repeat Lactate measurement to determine the effectiveness of their swim down routine (post swim – post swim down lactate reduction measurement test).
In the absence of a lactate measurement however, heart rate and time will provide most of the basic information needed for training prescription.
What we are looking at:
Main focus: Physiological and biomechanical efficiency at a range of swimming speeds directly related to training and racing.
Specific areas of measurement:
Target Group:
Competitive Age group and senior swimmers with good pacing skills.
When to test:
As with all tests, try to standardise as much as possible. Aim to at the same time of day, same day of the week during the swimming season. Ideally test on days when swimmers are recovered, ie Monday morning after a Sunday rest day. If swimming the first test in a 50 metre pool, try to complete the second and subsequent tests also in a 50 metre pool.
Recording Test Information:
Test information can be collected on a standardised data collection sheet. These sheets can be laminated to protect them from the weather and water of the training environment. Swimmers can be educated to record some test data on the sheets themselves using a waterproof pencil (Chinagraph pencil – available from stationary stores and some newsagencies). The advantages of swimmers recording their own test data include:
After testing, laminated sheets can be photocopied (ideally if A4 size) and kept for future reference and the sheets wiped down with mineral turpentine to be reused at the next test.
|
TEST PROTOCOL: 10 X 100 METRES as 3 x (3 x 100), 100 metres max speed swim |
|
||||||
|
Swimmer's Name: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test Date: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stroke: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Best time for stroke: 50 metres 100 metres 200 metres 400 metres |
|
||||||
|
Club: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coach: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time |
Split |
Heart Rate |
Stroke Count |
Stroke Rate |
Lactate |
Cycle |
|
AEROBIC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fastest-Slowest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THRESHOLD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fastest-Slowest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VO2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fastest-Slowest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 Max Speed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single Effort |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recovery Heart Rates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Immediate post swim |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 seconds post |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 seconds post |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 seconds post |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lactate 3-5 mins post swim |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Swim Down |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 x 100 test sheet – (recording sheet)
Data presentation (what to do with test results):
On a table show the times, heart rates, stroke counts, stroke rates etc.
Graph heart rate and speed / heart rate and time.
Graph speed (or time) and stroke count / distance per stroke in metres.
Graph speed (or time) and stroke rate in strokes per minute.
|
|
Time |
Split |
Heart Rate |
Stroke Count (both 50’s) |
Stroke Rate (2nd 50 only) |
Lactate |
Cycle |
|
AEROBIC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
1:25 |
42/43 |
145 |
38/41 |
33.8 |
|
1:40 |
|
100 |
1:26 |
42/44 |
147 |
38/42 |
34.1 |
|
1:40 |
|
100 |
1:25 |
42/43 |
149 |
39/43 |
32.6 |
2.9 |
1:40 |
|
Average |
1:25.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fastest-Slowest |
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THRESHOLD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
1:16 |
37/39 |
161 |
42/44 |
32.9 |
|
1:50 |
|
100 |
1:15 |
37/38 |
163 |
42/46 |
33.7 |
|
1:50 |
|
100 |
1:15 |
37/38 |
168 |
42/45 |
34.7 |
3.4 |
1:50 |
|
Average |
1:15.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fastest-Slowest |
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VO2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
1:11 |
35/36 |
180 |
44/49 |
39.7 |
|
2:00 |
|
100 |
1:10 |
34/36 |
179 |
45/49 |
40.0 |
|
2:00 |
|
100 |
1:11 |
34/37 |
184 |
46/51 |
39.1 |
4.5 |
2:00 |
|
Average |
1:10.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fastest-Slowest |
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 Max Speed |
1:06.5 |
32/34 |
191 |
47/55 |
47.5 |
6.2 |
|
|
Single Effort |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heart rate at 0 seconds |
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
|
|
Heart rate at 30 seconds post |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
|
|
Heart rate at 60 seconds post |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
|
|
Heart rate at 90 seconds post |
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
|
|
Post Swim Down lactate |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Post swim down heart rate |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
Example of a completed test of an age group swimmer.
(Personal best time 100 Freestyle 1:05). Stroke counts refer to the number of strokes for each 50, eg 44/49 means 44 strokes for the first 50 and 49 strokes for the second 50. Stoke rate is a measure of the number of strokes per minute.
What to look for at the first test:
What to look for next time (ie second and subsequent tests) IF the training program is working:
How to use the test results in the training program planning for the swimmer:
An important part of testing is correctly analysing the information gathered and using it to make effective changes to the training program.
In general, as a swimmer trains they become more efficient. They use less energy, less oxygen and take fewer strokes at the same speed. The challenge for the coach is to teach the swimmer to be efficient at higher and higher speeds.
If the testing process shows a clear trend of improvement, you have no problems. What do you do however, if test results show a decline in performance?
Test results are however only a guide. Often they are the objective support for the subjective feelings of a coach or athlete. A coach might test a swimmer to gather some hard evidence to support what he or she believes is happening based on experience and judgement.
In many cases the best testing protocol is for the coach and athlete to sit and talk about the program. The coach can “see” and observe, but can’t feel what the swimmer is experiencing. The swimmer “feels” but can’t see technique and skills. By working together, the seeing of the coach and the feeling of the swimmer can often provide the best solution.
The 10 x 100 test is a valuable coaching assessment tool. It can provide the coach and athlete with feedback into the progress and development of the training program and provide guidance for planning of future program initiatives.
Wayne Goldsmith
Author’s note: Any coach or athlete trying this test can send me the results and I am happy to look over the results and give some input.
Contact me at moregold@bigpond.com
References and further recommended reading
Maglischo EW, Maglischo CW and Bishop RA (1987), Lactate testing for training pace. Swim. Tech. 19: 31-37.
Maglischo EW. Swimming Even Faster. (1993), Mayfield Publishing Company. Mountain View, California, pp. 140-172.
Maglischo EW, Maglischo CW, Smith RE, Bishop RA and Novland PN. (1984), Determining the proper training speeds for swimmers. J. Swim. Res. 1:32-38.
Maw GJ and Volkers S. (1996), Measurement and application of stroke dynamics during training in your own pool. Aust. Swim. Coach 12(3):34-38.
Pyne, D., Maw, G. and Goldsmith W. (2000), Protocols for the Physiological Assessment of Swimmers. In: Gore C (ed) “Physiological Tests for Elite Athletes”, Published for the Australian Sports Commission by Human Kinetics Publishers, Champaign Illinois pp. 372-382.
Pyne DB (1989) The use and interpretation of blood lactate testing in swimming. Excel 5(4): 23–26.
Pyne DB and Telford RD (1988) Classification of swimming training sessions by blood lactate and heart rate responses. Excel 5(2):9–12.
Pyne DB (1995) Coach, I can’t get my heart rate up (or down): The physiology of measuring heart rates. Australian Swimming Coach 11(9):19–22.
Richardson MT, Zoerink D, Rinehardt CF, Cordial M, Bouchier N, and Latham C.(1996), Recovery from maximal swimming at the predicted initial onset of blood lactate accumulation. J. Swim. Res. 11:30-35.
Sharp RL. (1992) Exercise physiology: proper conditioning. In; J. Leonard (Ed) Science of Coaching Swimming. Leisure Press, Champaign, pp. 71-98.
Wakayoshi K, Yoshida T, Ikuta Y, Mutoh Y, and Miyashita M.(1993) Adaptations to six months of aerobic swim training - changes in velocity, stroke rate, stroke length and blood lactate. Int. J. Sports Med. 14:368-372.
Wakayoshi K, D’Acquisto LJD, Cappaert JM and Troup J. (1995) Relationship between oxygen uptake, stroke rate and swimming velocity in competitive swimmers. Int. J. Sports Med. 16:19-23.